Need updated paper with corrections based on the feedback
Thanks for providing this. You have a good topic. You’ve conducted a lot of great research in here.
Question though – why does the literature review start out as a literature review but then go into an annotated bibliography type document in section 4 with the hypotheses?
My section last term didn’t write about the hypotheses in chapter 2. Your chapter two is long enough with the hypotheses section. Unsure if you are planning to move that section to chapter 1 or not. If you are, there would need to be more content in chapter 2.
The references section has a minor alphabetical order issue with the last two. Please fix.
Using Microsoft to format references and in-text citations is not ideal. Word gets it wrong. All of your in-text citations with 3 or more authors is formatting incorrectly. This is to be (Author et al., year). I couldn’t fix them for you since you are using Word’s reference formatting thing. It won’t allow me to update/highlight/comment.
Then in section 4 most of your in-texts are wrong. You have first names in the in-text, and some are missing et al. I updated a few. Please be sure to update all intext citations.
Attached is your document. I made a lot of changes to formatting and incorrect spellings, updates to grammar. I turned on track changes. When you are finished updating all the citation issues and adding in missing citations, please send back to me for review.
Let me know if you have questions. Your chapter 2 is almost fully finished. Just need to get the in-text citations formatted properly!