Need an research paper on what law should be implied. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism. It is often crucial to persist in moral respect despite the circumstances (Ashton 34). This reality brings about moral anguish, yet it’s a certainty that such acts are grave wrong. No arguments justify the killing of helpless humans, not even overpopulation.
Abortion can never be smothered through the use of euphemism. All terms are inadequate to describe the ending of an individual’s rights. In this context, terms such as medical procedures and reproductive rights are most inadequate. Those who seek the right to commit abortion to prevent future harm are no different from those who plan to sin on the basis that they will plan to seek redemption afterward. There is no justification that corresponds to this. There is no necessary evil (Pell 320). The burdens that may accrue later in the future does not justify taking the life of a person. Putting the child for adoption after birth could help solve the dilemma. Abortion can never serve as a technique for birth control. One can never kill for convenience purposes or even contemplate in the creation of embryos to be destroyed in research or even consider the removal of organs from living babies. That is crossing the lines by disregarding human life.